browser-use vs invisible_dots
browser-use is the more adopted project, with 119,003 GitHub stars against 32,231 for invisible_dots (about 3.7x more). browser-use was updated more recently (today, against 3 days ago). browser-use is written in Python and invisible_dots in TypeScript.
| browser-use | invisible_dots | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Open-source Python library for AI browser agents, plus Browser Use Cloud: stealth browsers and a hosted agent API. | Open-source, self-hosted alternative to OpenAI Dots, Grok Bot. Built to be undetectable by anti-bot systems. |
| Author | browser-use | feder-cr |
| Stars | 119003 | 32231 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last update | 2026-10-24T07:23:03Z | 2026-10-21T18:46:52Z |
| Source | https://github.com/browser-use/browser-use | https://github.com/feder-cr/invisible_dots |
| Stars this week | +699 | +109 |
Which should you choose?
- browser-use describes itself as: "Open-source Python library for AI browser agents, plus Browser Use Cloud: stealth browsers and a hosted agent API."
- invisible_dots describes itself as: "Open-source, self-hosted alternative to OpenAI Dots, Grok Bot. Built to be undetectable by anti-bot systems."
Stars measure adoption, not fit. Read both READMEs for the tools each server exposes, then try them side by side in your client: the install guide shows how to add both.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more popular, browser-use or invisible_dots?
browser-use has more GitHub stars: 119,003 against 32,231. This week browser-use gained 699 stars and invisible_dots gained 109, which says more about current momentum than the all-time total. Both figures are refreshed daily from GitHub.
Are browser-use and invisible_dots open source?
browser-use: MIT (open source). invisible_dots: MIT (open source). An open-source license lets you run and self-host the server at no cost. If either one wraps a commercial API, that provider's pricing still applies, so read each README for the accounts and keys it needs.
Can I use browser-use and invisible_dots together?
Yes, if both run as MCP servers. MCP clients such as Claude Code, Cursor and VS Code can connect to several servers at once, and the agent picks tools from each. Give them distinct names in your config, and keep the number of active servers small so tool definitions do not crowd the context window.
Related comparisons
- browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp
- browser-use vs payload
- browser-use vs UI-TARS-desktop
- browser-use vs quasar
- browser-use vs browser-harness
- browser-use vs codex-chatgpt-web
- chrome-devtools-mcp vs invisible_dots
- payload vs invisible_dots
browser-use details · invisible_dots details · All Browser Automation MCP servers
Data last updated . Stars and downloads are refreshed every day from GitHub and npm.